2020년 4월 12일 일요일

03.04 - 시공간(Spacetime)

03.04 - 시공간(Spacetime) [커세라 강의 페이지]



Last section ended with the idea that the speed of light is the same in all inertial frames. Now let's connect this to the idea of spacetime and events.

전편에서 모든 관성 기준좌표계에서 (측정한) 빛의 속도는 같다는 점을 이야기했는데 이 번편에서는 시공간과 사건을 연관지어 생각해 보기로 하자.

Two astronauts moving at constant speeds relative to one another will measure the speed of light from all sources of light to have the exact same value which we write as a lowercase c. A constant speed is just the distance traveled by the time that has elapsed. Einstein realized that one way to explain why two astronauts moving relative to each other measure the same speed of light is because the two astronauts do not agree on the definitions of space and time. Instead of thinking about space and time as separate concepts, Einstein realized that he needed to consider the combination of both space and time into a concept he called spacetime.



속도는 이동한 거리를 이동에 소요된 시간으로 나눈다. [이 속도에 대한 전통적 정의는 새로운 이론에서도 적용되어야 한다.] 아인슈타인은 서로 다른 관성계에서 빛의 속도가 같으려면 시간과 공간을 분리해서 정의한 개념을 바꿔야 한다고 생각했다. 시간과 공간을 별개가 아닌 서로 연관된 개념으로 시공간(spacetime) 이라고 불렀다.

The universe consists of four dimensions. Three of those dimensions are spatial moving in the up-down dimension, the left-right dimension, and the forward back dimension. The last dimension is time, the past future dimension. Although, we don't say something moves in time, just that the flow of time itself moves us towards the future and away from the past at a speed of one second per second.



세상은 네개의 차원(dimensions)으로 이뤄졌다. 공간은 전후, 좌우, 상하로 세방향 움직임이 매우 직관적이다. 그런데 나머지 시간이라는 차원은 미래를 향해 나갈 뿐이다. 과거를 회상하거나 미래를 예상할 수는 이다 [회상과 예상 모두 생각이다. 공간은 바꿀 수 있지만 시간은 늦출 수 있을 뿐]

--------------------

Let's exercise our imagination to better understand how humans perceive time. Our senses collect information from the space around us but we exist only at a single moment in time. None of our senses can perceive the passage of time directly or changes in time for that matter. The best humans can do is to create memories of the past which allows us to affect change in their future environment. In that sense, we only experience a narrow slice of time.

우리는 시간을 어떻게 인지 할까? 우리는 시간을 직접 인지하지 못한다. 다만, 매순간마다 주변의 상황 변화(사건)을 기억하므로써 시간의 흐름을 안다.

So, how do we effectively imagine what a four-dimensional spacetime looks like? Well, let's start by considering an easier picture with fewer dimensions altogether. Suppose my fingers are limited to motion in only one spatial dimension like walking along my arm. I can move them forwards along my arm or backwards along my arm. But it's too narrow for left and right and my fingers are too weak for up and down. In essence, I've compressed three dimensions of space into a single dimension. So now, my fingers' position can be characterized by a single point along a line. If the fingers walk along my arm from elbow to hand, it takes some amount of time. Since we've got my fingers' distance on the horizontal axis, let's now plot time along the vertical axis. This diagram is called the spacetime diagram. Since we humans only see a narrow slice of the spatial dimensions, we need to reveal how my fingers' position changes with time. This curve, for example, shows that my fingers walk back and forth across my arm and also move forward in the time dimension. If we mask everything but a narrow slice, we get back to the original representation of my fingers position in space. This path is my fingers worldline.



네개의 차원을 가진 시공간은 어떻게 보면 좋을까? 논의를 단순화하기 위해 공간을 1개의 차원으로 줄여 보자. 그리고 가로축을 1차원 공간으로 세로축을 시간의 차원으로 두자. 이 그래프는 시간에 따라 움직임을 그린 것과 같다. 말하자면 이 시간 대 공간의 좌표축(시공간 도, spacetime diagram라고 부르자.)에 표시된 곡선의 경로는 시간에 따라 물체가 공간에서 이동한 모습을 보여주는 것으로 세계선(worldline)이라고 하자. [굽은 경로는 물체의 운동이 가속되었다는 뜻이다. 이 때 기준 좌표계는 지면으로 설정되었다. 앞으로 등속도로 움직이는 기준 좌표계 (관성계)를 다룰 것이다.]

Since photons must travel at the speed of light, a plot of position of a photon on a spacetime diagram will zoom outwards in a perfectly straight line. Normally, this line is drawn so that the light ray makes a 45-degree angle from the space and time axes. Anything that travels at speeds less than light such as people and rockets have worldlines that stay in the region between the time axis and the worldline of the light ray. The only way to escape from this region is to move faster than the speed of light. This diagram only shows light moving to the right. But light can also move to the left. And the left moving light will also be represented by a line that makes a 45-degree angle to the space and time axis.



빛의 속도로 움직이는 광자의 세계선을 시공간도 상에 그려보자. 빛의 속도는 상수이므로 45도의 직선이 된다. 광자 보다 낮은 속도, 현실속의 움직임들 제아무리 빠른 로켓도 빛보다 느리다. 이런 현실속의 속도는 광자의 세계선과 시간 축 사이에 놓인다.

This diagram shows only one dimension, the left-right dimension. But there is also a back and forth dimension that comes in and out of the screen that we aren't showing. Light also travels at 45-degree angles to the back and forth dimension's axis. The two-dimensional surface that light can travel on is called the light cone. In addition, there is a third dimension, up and down and it would be really difficult to show this dimension in a drawing of this sort. In a spacetime diagram, the light cone defines the boundary of spacetime events that a person or any object that travels at speeds slower than light can experience. People can travel upwards in the time dimension in directions that stay inside the light cone. Experiencing events outside of the light cone would require that we can travel faster than light. This means that people and all objects with mass are confined to our own personal light cones.



-----------------------------------------------

실제로 시공간이 무엇인지 설명하기는 매우 어렵다. 더구나 3차원 공간에 시간의 차원을 더한 시공간을 보여 주기는 곤란하다.

It's hard to convey what spacetime actually is. One way to visualize spacetime is to imagine a three-dimensional object and then try to extend its dimensionality across time. A person is human-shaped in three dimensions but in four-dimensional spacetime, a person is a long tube that includes the person in the past, present, and future. If you slice this four-dimensional tube in the time dimension, a three-dimensional version of the person at that moment in time is the slice.

The four-dimensional spacetime we live in is similar to a block of cheese if we reduce spacetime to only two dimensions. We can imagine the ends of this cheese as the two space dimensions and the length of the cheese as the time dimension.

So a hole in Swiss cheese becomes a cheese being, living inside of a block of cheese time or space cheese or space cheese time. You get the idea. A cheese being at rest thinks of time running along the long axis of the cheese and the two-dimensional space that it lives in is the flat end of the cheese. Humans are all powerful higher dimensional beings with a cheese knife and we can slice up the block of cheese into thin slices. Each slice of cheese represents a single moment of time as experienced by the cheese being. At one end of the cheese there are no cheese beings but as we slice through their time dimension, we discover the birth of a cheese being growing to larger sizes and eventually disappearing.

Just like our four-dimensional human tube. From our perspective, a cheese being has been born, lived a fruitful life and died a cheesy death. Here's where things get interesting though. A different cheese being that moves at a constant speed through the cheese will slice up the cheese in different direction. The moving cheese being will see different size slices and think the times and sizes are different as if the cheese spacetime itself were somehow warped. However, if we were to take the same cheese block and slice it up in yet another direction, we can do it such that both observers agree on where the bubbles are in spacetime but they can't agree on how it was sliced. We can only speculate whether Einstein used cheese to describe spacetime but if he did surely we can all agree that it must have been tasty.

-----------------------------------------------------
[처음][이전][다음]


2020년 4월 11일 토요일

03.03 - 특수 상대론의 도입(Introducing Special Relativity Theory)

03.03 - 특수 상대론의 도입(Introducing Special Relativity Theory) [커세라 강의 페이지]



Just as sound waves propagate in water, it was once believed that light waves propagate in a medium called aether. This presented an opportunity for experimental physicists to measure the motion of the earth with respect to the aether. In 1887, two scientists named Michelson and Morley conducted an experiment to do just that. But no matter which the direction they pointed their apparatus, they measured the same speed of light through the aether. This forced them to conclude that the aether did not exist and that light would always be seen traveling at the same speed.



앞서 수중 음파의 전달을 다뤘듯이 빛도 에테르(aether)라는 매질을 통해 전달 된다고 믿었다. 1887년 미켈슨(Michelson)과 몰리(Morley)는 에테르를 찾고자 실험을 했지만 실패했다. 에테르는 존재하지 않는 것으로 결론을 내렸다.

This puzzled scientists worldwide, well, except for one, Einstein. Einstein imagined what it would be like to see the universe from the perspective from a beam of light. He asked questions like how would a photon perceive the passage of time? And will distances shrink and stretch depending on the motion of an observer? Of relevance to him was the fact that experiments had proven that light waves were special compared to sound waves or water waves. In that they didn't require a medium through which to propagate.

에테르가 존재하지 않는다는 사실은 많은 과학자들을 혼란케 했지만 아인슈타인은 달랐다. 그가 가진 의문은 시간의 흐름에 광자는 어떻게 변할지, 관측자의 운동에 따라 (광자가 이동한) 길이가 줄거나 늘지 않을까 라는 것이었다. [빛은 매질 없이 전달된다. 매질이 없으므로 빛(광자)의 운동은 물속의 음파 전달의 경우 처럼 매질의 속도에 더해지거나 빼지 않는다. 빛의 속도는 불변이다. 움직이는 물체에서 출발한 광자나 정지한 물체에서 출발한 광자든 속도가 불변이다. 동시에 출발한 광자는 동일한 지점에 도달해야 한다. 이동한 거리가 늘어나거나 시간이 느리게 가야 한다. 빛의 속도로 움직이는 광자의 입장에서 시간과 공간(시공간, spacetime)이 왜곡된다.]

In helping us to understand these new revelations, Einstein had to tackle problems which few could ever even consider. In one of Einstein's most famous papers entitled On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies, he introduced two very important ideas. Ideas which are now among the foundation of modern physics.

이런 (빛의 속도 불변으로 제기된) 문제를 풀기위해 아인슈타인은 누구도 하지 못했던 생각을 '이동하는 물체의 전기 동역학에 관하여'라는 논문으로 냈다. [빛은 전자기파다.] 이 논문에는 현대 물리학의 근간이 된 중요한 이론을 세웠다.

They are, 1, the laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of reference. And 2, light moves at the same speed relative to all observers. That first postulate seems reasonable.



------------------------------------------------
1. 모든 관성계에서 물리법칙은 동일하다.

The laws of physics are the same for me here as they are for you sitting there. The laws of physics are the same on the moon as they are here on Earth. In physics, this principle is essential, as we use it all the time in order to learn about places that are distant from us.


물리법칙은 위치에 상관없다. 지구에 있든 달에 가 있든 모두 같은 물리법칙의 지배를 받는다.

An inertial reference frame is either an experiment at rest or one moving with a constant velocity. Inertial frames are not accelerating. For example, someone standing in a high speed train would experience the same laws of physics as someone stationary on the ground, so long as neither are accelerating. The first postulate is intuitive to human beings which makes the second one impossibly hard to believe at first glance.


등속운동하는 곳 어디에 기준 좌표계를 설정해도 물리 법칙은 같다. 관성 좌표계는 가속하지 않는다.

---------------------------------------------------
2. 관측자(등속운동을 하든 정지해 있든)에 상관없이 빛의 속도는 같다.

Einstein's second postulate was that light moves at the same speed relative to all observers. So if we were to measure the speed of light from a fast moving astronaut, we don't add the astronaut's speed to the speed of light. Weird, right? The speed of light always comes out to the same value, no matter how fast the astronaut is traveling. Einstein realized that if the laws of physics are the same for all observers, then all observers must agree on the value of the speed of light.

---------------------------------------------------

상대운동, 서로 다른 속도로 (하지만 등속으로) 움직이는 관측자에 따라 관측되는 속도가 다르다.

You've probably experienced some of the strange effects of changing reference frames before. Have you ever been in a parked car when an adjacent car starts moving? In some cases, your brain tricks you into thinking that you're moving instead of the other car. Since motion is relative, we can always choose a reference frame that is stationary, even if there's relative motion to something else. Let me explain.


Suppose you're riding in a self-driving car. Some fast cars are passing you in the left lane and you are passing some slow cars in the right lane. If all the cars are moving at a constant but different speed, each car is their own inertial reference frame. If you observe the cars from the ground they will all appear to be moving.

If, however, you choose a reference frame of the car in the middle lane, the cars on the left appear to be moving forward. While the cars in the right lane appear to be moving backwards. Without the road in the background, we can't figure out how fast the cars are traveling. The only thing we can tell is how fast they're traveling with respect to one another.

---------------------------------------------

누구에게나 빛의 속도는 같다는 개념을 도입하니 상대속도를 설명하기 어려워졌다.

However, this becomes problematic when light is introduced. Instead of driving during the day, what if our cars are driving at night? They'll need to turn their headlights on. And If the center car turns on their headlights, they'll see photons leaving at the speed of light, c.


Let's consider the headlights of the cars in the left lane. Does the speed of light coming from the fast car appear faster due to the relative motion? No, even though the red car is moving faster, the photons coming out of the headlights always appear to move at the speed of light, c. The speed of light from the middle car is not c minus 10 kilometers due to the motion of the cars. And the same is true for the slower blue car. The speed of light is always measured as c.

Weird? Einstein thought so, too. Clearly, if Einstein's second postulate, that all observers measure the speed of light as a constant, is to hold true, we need some other kind of transformation group, so that every observer can see the light beams moving relative to themselves, at c. In order to do such a thing, Einstein realised that our intuitions about space and time must be incorrect. And that a new theory is required to describe how all observers, moving at different speeds, can measure the speed of light to be a constant.

모든 관찰자(등속운동을 하는)에게 빛의 (측정한) 속도는 같다. 아인슈타인도 이를 그냥 받아들이기 어려웠다. 그래서 새로운 이론을 세워야만 했다. [솜씨 좋은 목수가 궁한 물건을 만들어 쓰듯이 아인슈타인은 이해가 않되면 이론을 만들어 냈다. 나만 편하면 되는 것이 아니라 우주를 통찰하는 이론이다. 그는 '끕'이 다른 재주꾼 이라고 해야겠다.]

----------------------------------------
[처음][이전][다음]


2020년 4월 9일 목요일

03.02 - 물고기의 시공간(Fishing in Spacetime)

03.02 - 물고기의 시공간(Fishing in Spacetime) [커세라 강의 페이지]



* 앞선 동영상편에서 폭포수의 두마리 물고기의 예를 들어 시공간의 사고 실험의 소재로 삼았다. 물이 가진 의미를 따져 보자.

Suppose we have two fish swimming in a gentle stream above a waterfall. Let's assume that since the fish are immersed in the water, they don't really have a concept of what water is. They consider water to be a natural immutable part of their environment.



천천히 흐르는 강에 물고기 두마리가 헤엄치고 있다. 물속에 잠겨 있는 물고기의 입장에서 물의 의미는 당연한 것이다. 물고기의 입장에서 물은 필수 불가결한 환경요소다.

As you well know, water is not the framework of the universe. But to a fish, it might as well be. So, our two happy fish are living their fishy lives exchanging fishy details about fish stuff by communicating through sound waves in the water. We'll assume now that the fish don't communicate visually and that all of their communication is limited to sound. Maybe it's night in the stream or maybe the fish are unable to see because of mud in the water. Consider the speed of the stream. Since it's flowing slowly, the fish can stay relatively stationary with just a few swishes of their tails. The motion of the water is similar to the effects that we perceive as spacetime.



물이 우주의 기본 틀(framework)가 될수는 없지만 두 물고기에게 중요한 환경이고 수중 음파를 통해 서로 대화할 것이다. 물고기는 시각적 인지능력은 없이 오직 소리만을 사용한다고 가정하자. 강물의 속도는 아주 느리기 때문에 물고기는꼬리만 조금 흔들면 정지할 수 있다. 물의 움직임은 우리가 시공간 이라고 인식하는 것과 유사하다. [우리가 시공간을 당연히 인지하듯 물고기에게 물은 당연한 것이다. 물의 표면이 만들수 있는 유연한 형상과 연속성을 감안하면 왜곡된 시공간의 비유에 적절하다.]

Keep in mind, both the fish and the water can have independent speeds and that there's no universal limit for how fast they can go. So it's possible for the fish and the water itself to exceed the speed of sound in water. Our fish can't swim that fast. But perhaps, one of our fish is researching a faster than sound jetpack.



물고기와 물살의 속도는 서로 무관하고 속도에 제한이 없다고 하자. 물고기와 물살은 수중음파의 속도보다 빠르게 움직일 수는 있다. 하지만 우리의 상황에 등장하는 물고기들은 빠르게 헤엄치지 못한다. 그대신 음파 돌파 제트 추진장치를 달 수도 있다고 하자.

At one end of the stream, the current is drawn into a rushing waterfall. The water pouring over the top of the waterfall gets faster as it falls, traveling faster and faster towards the bottom. The waterfall can be divided into two regions with a short transition between them. The first region is the top, where the stream's water begins to accelerate. But the water flows slower than the speed of sound. Below this first region, there's a transition, where the speed of the water is equal to the speed of sound in water. In the lower region, the water is flowing faster than the speed of sound.



강의 끝에는 폭포가 있다. 폭포수가 떨어지는 속도는 매우 빠르다. 폭포를 두 구역으로 나누는데 윗부분은 물이 가속되기 시작한다. 하지만 아직 소리의 속도에 도달하지 못했다. 그 아래로 천이 구간인데 마침내 폭포수의 속도가 음파속도에 이른다. 이어서 물의 속도는 음파속도보다 빠른 구역이다.

When both fish are above the waterfall, they can carry out a fishy conversation without any difficulty. When they speak, the speed of the stream has very little effect on how the sound travels between them. But what do you think will happen if one of the fish is carried over the top of the waterfall? Let's examine what the two fish experience as the traveling fish descends through the two regions of the waterfall.

폭포위 하천에서 두마리의 물고기는 하천의 속도가 빠르지 않아서 어려움 없이 대화 할 수 있다. 만일 물고기 한마리가 폭포에 빠지면 둘 사이에 어떻게 대화할 수 있을까? 폭포수의 속도 구역에 따라 달라질 것이다.

In the first region of the waterfall, where the water is gently accelerating over the edge, our adventurist fish is heard yelling for the help of his friend, "Help me. I'm being swept over a waterfall." The sound waves emitted by the yelling fish propagate back up the stream towards the stationary fish upstream. Since the velocity of the water in this region is lower than the speed of sound, the fish can still be heard by its companion. However, since the fish is yelling in flowing water, the sound waves travel at the speed of sound minus the speed of the water in the waterfall. The stationary fish will hear the falling fish's voice as being deeper the faster the water flows in the waterfall. This is due to the Doppler effect. <deep voice> "Help me. I continued to be swept further down this waterfall."

폭포가 시작되는 구간은 물의 속도가 가속을 시작했지만 음파보다 느리다. 빨간 물고기의 구조신호가 위로 전달되어 파란 물고기는 이를 들을 수 있다. 하지만 음파의 속도는 물의 속도에서 뺀 값이 되므로 정지한 물고기에게 떨어지는 물고기의 소리는 저음으로 들린다. 바로 도플러 효과 때문이다.

At the transition between the two regions, the speed of water is equal to the speed of sound. At this point, any sounds emitted by the falling fish would appear to be completely stationary. This corresponds to an infinite Doppler shift, and the sound waves would be stretched by the motion of the water. The sound emitted by the falling fish would be so low. It would become inaudible to the fish upstream.



떨어지는 물고기가 천이 구역에 이를 수록 떨어지는 물고기 속도가 소리속도에 도달하면 무한대 도플러 편이가 되어 위의 서 있는 물고기는 아무소리도 들지 못하게 된다.

So, what exactly happens when the falling fish is carried beyond this point? At the point in the waterfall where the speed of the water is equal to the speed of sound, the infalling fish's calls can no longer be heard by the fish upstream. This region in the waterfall is similar to the event horizon of a black hole. Recall that the speed of light is the escape velocity from an event horizon. So, similarly, the part of the waterfall where the stream flows at the speed of sound is just like an event horizon. Since the information carried by sound is trapped, we can call this a sonic event horizon.

마치 블랙 에서 탈출속도가 빛의 속도와 같아지는 '사건 지평선'과 유사한 상황이 벌어진다. 폭포수가 떨어지는 속도와 음파속도가 같아지는 지점을 음파 사건지평선 이라하자.



What does the infalling fish experience? Well, beyond the awareness that it's going over a waterfall, its experience is almost indistinguishable from the stationary fish. Since the infalling fish is accelerated at the same rate as the water around it, it feels like it's in a perfectly still environment, oblivious to the peril that it's in. Not only that, but the infalling fish would continue to hear its companion upstream.

떨어지는 물고기는 폭포수와 함께 가속되기 때문에 아무 위험을 느끼지 못한다. 게다가 위에 있는 동료 물고기의 소리도 들을 수 있다.

Why? Because the upstreams fish's sound waves are being carried along and accelerated with the flow of the water instead of against it. So, communication into the sonic event horizon is possible just like it's possible to send light rays into a black hole.

위의 물고기 소리가 폭포수의 흐름과 함께 가속되고 있다. 따라서 마치 블랙홀 안으로 빛을 들여 보낼 수 있듯이 소리사건지평선에 이르기까지 두 물고기 사이의 대화는 가능하다.



This analogy illustrates a couple of important points about black holes, but it does have some limitations that we need to consider.

First and foremost, a black hole has a singularity at its core. Unlike a waterfall, which has a bottom and a region for water to flow outwards, there is no escape from a fall into a black hole. We might try to illustrate this by adding sharp rocks at the bottom of the waterfall, which obliterate anything including the fish that encounter it. However, we also said that the speed of light is the universal limit, not the speed of sound. In fact, this gives our adventurous little fish an opportunity to escape.



블랙홀을 물고기와 폭포수의 비유에 있어서 몇 가지 고려사항:

가장 중요한 사항을 꼽자면 블랙홀의 중심은 특이점 (무한히 작은 점에 거대 질량이 몰려 있음)이라는 점이다. 한번 빠지면되돌아 나올수 없다. 게다가 빛의 속도는 우주 불변의 상수다. 이에 비해 똑똑한 물고기는 제트 추진장치를 메고 폭포를 거슬러 오를 수 있다.

Perhaps the motivation for the falling fish to go over the waterfall is because it's an inventor fish who has discovered the secret to underwater rocket technology. Perhaps this inventor fish accidentally dropped a rocket pack over the waterfall and was on a mission to retrieve it. If the fish reaches its rocket pack before hitting the rocks at the bottom of the waterfall, it can accelerate to a speed faster than that of the water's flow and return to the safety of the stream where its companion anxiously awaits. This analogy does demonstrate some key physics with respect to the behavior of sound waves in the region around an event horizon, similar to the behavior of light around black holes.

Some scientists have created bathtub drain black holes in the laboratory in order to gain a better understanding of the environment around black holes. These drain holes probe the behavior of event horizons in much the same way that our fish encountered a sonic event horizon. So, why did the fish cross the waterfall? Well, to rescue his jetpack, of course. So long and thanks for all the fish.



어떤 과학자들은 배수구에 물이 회오리 치며 빠져나가는 모형을 블랙홀에 비유하기도 한다.

--------------------------------------------------------------
[처음][이전][다음]


2020년 4월 7일 화요일

03.01 - 시공간 소개(Introduction: The Structure of Spacetime)

03.01 - 시공간 소개(Introduction: The Structure of Spacetime) [커세라 강의 페이지]



In order to understand more about black holes, we need to understand the concept of spacetime. Most people are familiar with the concepts of space and time and think of them as separate quantities.



블랙홀을 더 잘 이해하려면 시공간(spacetime)의 개념을 이해할 필요가 있다. 대개 공간과 시간을 별개로 다루는 데 익숙하다. [시간, 공간 그리고 중력이 한데 엮여 있다. 물리에서 다루는 가장 기초가 되는 차원은 LTM으로 Length, Time, Mass 이다.]

But, Einstein's theories of Special and General Relativity show us that different observers do not agree on measurements of distance and intervals of time.

아인슈타인의 특수 및 일반 상대론에 따르면 (운동하는) 관측자마다 측정한 길이와 시간 간격이 저마다 일치하지 않는다. [상대론은 이해하기 어렵다. 그나마 정속 운동인 점이 얼마나 다행인가. 가속운동이 었더라면 어디서 나온 힘인지 훨씬 어려웠을 테니까... 일단 에너지 보존 부터 확실히 해두자.]

What everyone can agree on is the mixture of these two concepts in the framework called spacetime. Spacetime is used to explain all of the strange effects we encounter in the theories of special and general relativity. For example, why is the speed of light the ultimate limit in the universe? Why do moving clocks run slow compared to stationary clocks?



시공간(spacetime)이라는 틀(frame) 안에서 시간과 공간의 측량이 모두에게 일치할 수 있게 해보자. 상대론을 접하게 되면 마주치는 시공간의 개념은 아주 낮설긴 하다. 시공간이 틀어진 예를 들면, 빛의 속도는 왜 우주 불변인가? 이동하며 시간을 재면 정지했을 때보다 느리게 가는 이유는 뭘까? [시간과 공간이 틀어진 이유는 모두 질량이 주는 효과 때문이야!]

------------------------

An interesting way of understanding the basic properties of black holes is to consider a simple example involving sound waves instead of light. In 1972, black hole physicist William Unruh devised a thought experiment consisting of a fish calling out to its friend as it falls over a waterfall.

블랙홀의 특성을 이해하는 사고 실험: 폭포로 떨어지는 물고기와 폭포 위의 물고기.


At a certain point in the waterfall, the speed of the water exceeds the speed of sound and the falling fish can no longer be heard by its friend above.

폭포물의 떨어지는 속도가 소리의 속도보다 빠르다면, 떨어지는 물고기가 소리를 질러도 폭포 위의 동료 물고기에게 전달 되지않을 것이다.

This is an example of a sonic black hole, an analogy that uses sound waves instead of light waves to help us understand black hole physics. Of course, this example makes lots of assumptions.

이 폭포를 음성 블랙홀이라고 하자. 이제 소리를 빛으로 바꿔보자. 블랙홀은 빛이 새어나 오지 않는다. (빛보다 빠르게 빨아들여서?)

For one, I don't know how a fish would yell underwater but that's beside the point. Let's dive right in and see how a fish experiences water as spacetime and what it can tell us about the nature of black holes.

떨어지는 물고기는 폭포의 물을 시공간으로 인지했다고 하자. 소리 속도는 변함이 없다. 시간이 느리게 가면 소리가 전달되는 거리가 길어진다. 블랙홀의 특성이다. 블랙홀이 시공간을 결합해 왜곡 시킨다.

-------------------------------------
[처음][이전][다음]


2020년 4월 6일 월요일

02.12 - 전문가 대화: 태양의 자매별은 어디에? (Where are the Sun's siblings?)

02.12 - 전문가 대화: 태양의 자매별은 어디에?(Where are the Sun's siblings?) [커세라 강의 페이지]



One of the outcomes of our thinking about the sun growing up or being born in a neighborhood and then growing up with a bunch of other stars is that we actually have stellar siblings. Those stellar siblings have left the nest, this cluster in which we formed and have gone out, and we think that right now we have stellar siblings that are spread throughout the galaxy.

The stars that are formed in clusters ultimately dissolve into the background of stars within the galaxy. But if we look out, we can actually see individual stars out there that have basically the same pattern of chemical enrichment as the sun, and we think that those were the stars that we were formed with.

We can never know because we'd have to unwind billions of years of going around the center of the galaxy and map it back and make sure we're at the same place, and that's something we really can't understand from the dynamics of the stars around us. But the signature does point to every now and then we can look out and we pass one of the siblings stars near which we were born.

먼지구름(그래봐야 입방 미터당 먼지 분자 십여개)에서 별이 태어난다. 거대한 규모의 먼지 구름에서 태양만 생성 되었을까? 관측에 의하면 은하계 별중 절반이상이 동반성을 가지고 있다. 그렇다면 태양은? 태양은 동반성이 발견되지 않았다. 태양은 특별한 존재인가? 그럴리가!

----------------------------------------------
[처음][이전][다음]